Those Sneaky Democrats..
If you were duped into thinking that the only folks in attendance at Kansas Days this previous weekend were Republicans, we're here to tell you otherwise.
Yes, there was a tall, bearded creature lurking from room to room, trying unsuccesfully to blend in with the crowd. He seemed to be a very interested observer, carrying a video camera and audio recorder, hoping to catch Kansas Republican officials in an out-of-context moment that may be worthy of a 'YouTube' moment.
Though he tried hard to remain anonymous, literally everyone in the room knew exactly who he was. That said, his name still remains a mystery. When entering rooms he went by 'Scott' and 'Josh.' Knowing better, Kansas Republicans came up with their own preferred nomenclature, referring to the creature as...'Lurch.'
Just look below for a glimpse of the Kansas Democratic Party's most prominent foot soldier.
As we previously mentioned, we don't yet have a name for this Democrat infiltrator and Lurch simply won't work in this politically correct era. So, we have no choice but to ask for your help. Do you know this man's name? If not, do you have a name that you think would be fitting? Go ahead and post it in the comment section. C'mon Kansans - show us that witty flare that we know you've got.
And, most importantly, make sure to go up and introduce yourself to the big guy the next time he finds occasion to worship Kansas' Republican leaders.
Yes, there was a tall, bearded creature lurking from room to room, trying unsuccesfully to blend in with the crowd. He seemed to be a very interested observer, carrying a video camera and audio recorder, hoping to catch Kansas Republican officials in an out-of-context moment that may be worthy of a 'YouTube' moment.
Though he tried hard to remain anonymous, literally everyone in the room knew exactly who he was. That said, his name still remains a mystery. When entering rooms he went by 'Scott' and 'Josh.' Knowing better, Kansas Republicans came up with their own preferred nomenclature, referring to the creature as...'Lurch.'
Just look below for a glimpse of the Kansas Democratic Party's most prominent foot soldier.
As we previously mentioned, we don't yet have a name for this Democrat infiltrator and Lurch simply won't work in this politically correct era. So, we have no choice but to ask for your help. Do you know this man's name? If not, do you have a name that you think would be fitting? Go ahead and post it in the comment section. C'mon Kansans - show us that witty flare that we know you've got.
And, most importantly, make sure to go up and introduce yourself to the big guy the next time he finds occasion to worship Kansas' Republican leaders.
He looks like he's straight out of Lawrence!
Reply to this
If that guy's not a Dem, I don't know who is
Reply to this
yes, yes, please find a name you can call him next time he's filming.
That worked soooooooo well in Virginia.
Reply to this
Well, this certainly will show those naysayers who claim that all SRK does is post juvenile and irrelevant posts. Finally, a post that will get to the core of this year's election. The picture does, however, capture the essence of Kansas Days this year; no one was there. One could only wish that Kobach and Morgan were clever enough to try and figure out what the Dems were up to. Maybe they could disguise themselves as 2 of the 3 stooges and show up at Dem events.
Reply to this
This photo was taken at Memorial Hall where the SOS and AG's offices are located, NOT at Kansas Days.
Reply to this
Man, what a douchebag, I think his name is Josh Lerner.
Reply to this
That is definitely Josh Lerner, I went to ESU w/ him.
Reply to this
So the GOP is watching the guy that the Dems have watching the GOP? No wonder Republicans are losign this state.
Reply to this
A good source tells me that this man's name is Peter Sellers.
Reply to this
I've seen him before. A friend of mine told me that his name's Richard Saunders and he writes some ridiculous blog that he insists on calling an almanac. He's a typical Massachusetts liberal though.
Reply to this
This man is outrageously handsome.
Reply to this
This is lurch, but my best friends call me 'Macaca'"
Reply to this
It's the ghost of Barry Goldwater. He's wondering what those four individuals up top have to do with conservative politics.
Reply to this
That is definitely Yahweh. We definately went on a bitchin' 40 day road trip back in high school. Wasn't all that fun, though, a bunch of stuff caught on fire.
Reply to this
It looks like Bigfoot's dick.
I wouldn't screw him with Bea Arthur's cock.
Reply to this
Dad?!?
Reply to this
Seriously though, what is the Party coming to when just anyone can walk through the doors and listen in?
This is a closed club, people. We have secrets that we cannot let them know. Admittance should be by invitation only.
Reply to this
Hey maybe you folks should waste your time trying to unravel the mystery that is why you are so out of touch with the American people?
He's probably a terrorist, though. Maybe we should "liberate" his family.
And by liberate I mean be as self righteous as humanly possible, lie about their political affiliates, accuse them of having WMDs that they don't have, and then bombing the shit out of their homeland until we think we come off looking like "heroes." Wait, this sounds vaguely familiar...
Reply to this
Typical KS Dem behavior. In 2006 they paid Andrew Treaster (son of a current state Rep from Hutch) to follow Republican candidates around. He even coughed up $50 to attend the KRA Banquet that year (what a dedicated spy he was). People tolerated him for a couple of months and then it got old and they started tossing him out of Republican-only events.
Reply to this
That's his uncle actually...
Reply to this
Man, you Republicans REALLY need to work on your intelligence gather. You know, in politics, it's important to have accurate information. Like, say, when deciding to start A WAR.
Reply to this
Yeah, might as well call him "Andrew Treason"!!!!
Reply to this
Don't taze me, bro!
Reply to this
I love how the Republicans get mad when people are watching them. Really, that's all this blog entry is about -- "How dare you, Democrats, for paying attention to what we're saying!" The same goes for the comments about Andrew Treaster. What, are you all worried that now you can't just stand up and shoot your mouth off without thinking (see, e.g., "macaca")?
If you're not willing to be accountable for your words, don't open your mouth. It really is that simple.
Reply to this
I don't think anyone's mad, they seem to find it funny that the Dims would send out such a sad-sack, sullen kid to gather info. Everything about him in this picture (from the carefully messed grooming to the uber-expensive footwear)says "I'm a donkey!".
Reply to this
Wow, that shows just how superficial you are.
Maybe that's why us "sad-sack sullen kids" align with the more-inclusive Democrats. Better watch out, you Republicans will be extinct some day!
Reply to this
He may be a donkey, but you're the real ass.
Reply to this
Wow Just Sayin, if you think that this look is "careful grooming" and that Nike's are "uber-expensive" I'd like to see how you dress. Here's my guess:
http://comics212.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/man-wearing-barrel.jpg
Reply to this
I know this man. His name is Dustin Goldenfork. When I was an undergraduate at Dartmouth, he was a graduate student, and taught an English course on Shakespeare. Alas, the lad fell on hard times, after the dean of the College of Arts, Werner Featherbottom, concocted a pernicious fabrication involving a torrid affair between Dustin and an established British Lord. Twas cruel fate, that led Dustin to such base means at obtaining a living; as I recall, he had ambitions of turning a small fortune on the fertile markets of Zimbabwe.
Reply to this
Miss Anonymous sez...
HOT HOT HOT!!! Too bad he's a) straight and b) married.
Reply to this
I've seen him before. He was in my concealed weapons class. Dudes got gunz.
Reply to this
<----- This man has no penis
Reply to this
I like turtles!
Reply to this
What a dashing young fellow. Republicans would be lucky to have such a fine chap on their side. Cheers.
Reply to this
I hear he's a good lay.
Reply to this
Aye, for he may, on first glance, appear laconic, he is in fact simply lost. He is a magnificent specimen, the Roaming Democrat. He makes his business doing the People's Work from Fall to Spring. I had rare occasion to see one in person and it was truly life-altering. I gaze upon the predilect, oafish handling of the naming conversation and I weep through my burly facial hair. This beautiful animal is equally as majestic as the American Eagle, the turkey (Ben Franklin's suggestion for National Bird), or John Boehner. Sooth to the mouths of those vomitous turds that disparage the Roaming Democrat, for surely, those that leak vitriol out of their cavernous word-holes are merely Republicans, concerned simply with the image they convey and the fear of contaly being wrong. Sadly, this isn't so much a fear as it is reality.
Ok, truth time...I'm not Rutherford B. Hayes. But you are all morons for thinking opponent research is a new concept or something to be feared. That aside entirely, when did it become common-place to belittle someone based on appearance in public? This blog, which I use in the strictly technical sense because that is the only way it could be considered of value (as virtual real estate) is a complete pile. The only thing more insulting than its constant lack of content is the delusion that this, in ANY WAY, represents even twelve people from the great state of Kansas. If this blog were a building, I would desecrate it. If this blog were a deity, I would use its name in vein just to spite it. If this blog were informational, pigs would fly and politics would be about helping people and not disparaging common aspirations of making people's lives better. Oh, but to dream. Kansas is not red. It is purple. You are partisan hacks not worth the digital space you rent.
Reply to this
I find it hilarious (or sardonic, if you like that kind of word) that a sampling of Republicans constantly deign themselves a band of righteous, political shock-jocks while still bemoaning an imagined liberal infection taking hold of the media and society at large. It's a special kind of piety that can convince a person their hypocrisy is enlightened, their smug insults are Christian, and their agendas are moral. People who wield this kind of humor are supposed to be godless and absurd. At the base of insult comedy is a bold appreciation for the absurdity of life itself, not a specific brand, creed, or ilk of countryman. You, Concerned Kansans, are brandishing a weapon you have no understanding of or respect for.
Your writing lacks any real context. You sound desperate and hateful. You write poorly, and that only makes your ear for stupidity tinnier. Would you have owned your nominal condescension looking Lurch in the eye? Would that somehow tip off pride in you? Why? This blog is uglier than a bathroom stall, and slightly less dignified to sit in on.
And before you go trolling for wit, consider this quotation from William Hazlitt: “Wit is the salt of conversation, not the food.” Physician, heal thyself.
Reply to this
You're a freaking nutjob, buddy.
Reply to this
I'm sure it's easier for you that way.
Critical thinking clearly isn't your forte. Way to post it twice, though. Quantity trumps quality, I guess. You're a winner. Anonymous.
Reply to this
You're a freaking nutjob, buddy.
Reply to this
I saw a rotting corpse today and thought of your blog.
Reply to this
I think I saw those same shoes taking a wide stance.
Reply to this
This soooooo reminds me of when Roseanne sang the national anthem!
Reply to this
Yeah, that guy's practically dangling from a tether in your security room, trying not to sweat on the floor sensors. How did he get away with that?!
Reply to this
Wait a tick! I sat by that guy in my college econ class. His attendance and work ethic were terrible! I guess crappy work like that is what you do with a political science degree. He sure looks creepier now days, too.
Reply to this
[URL=http://wgtzwdma.com]oqzxpywy[/URL] khbkecay http://vnnurhvs.com mmfeykcw filglaob ayhgbsrh">http://briawkyd.com">ayhgbsrh
Reply to this
igctnvsh http://zinduihd.com rnvsbaib pzshinyf ozrrdico">http://oveswwcm.com">ozrrdico [URL=http://lvjkghge.com]aoopnisv[/URL]
Reply to this
A man with a beard? Good God in Heaven...he must be one of those "hippies"..or maybe even "a gay". Someone stop this man!
Reply to this
gdwtsnmv">http://kixfmvxk.com">gdwtsnmv [URL=http://blnxsjck.com]pokyctoj[/URL] curcqlka http://phonxqvk.com fxixekmf fmqylyim
Reply to this
wuhjmlyk">http://sotoidcc.com">wuhjmlyk jauclsbo http://bpzyaulr.com fjfpaegi gdfaoegi [URL=http://hwubadhp.com]jioyvnyg[/URL]
Reply to this
aifmcyyp">http://dzmjhaca.com">aifmcyyp derawlsi http://feakbiqg.com gtqcpjlj pspslipm [URL=http://svpzcvkt.com]toptkofe[/URL]
Reply to this
I've seen him around at some of the events. He introduced himself as Braden (or Brandon?) Overbrook, an interested newbie from Tennessee. We made small talk a little about current events, etc, but then he started talking about Phill Kline about how handsome he was. I'll leave it to the imagination where he took it from there. But anyways, he doesn't seem to spy-like to me, but I wouldn't trust him if I caught him with a necktie, camcorder and cucumber.
Reply to this