Sebelius aide caught in prosituition sting
The media is reporting that Jeff Montague, Sebelius' HR director for the Department of Commerce, was caught by Topeka police for soliciting sodomy.
Surprisingly, Sebelius hasn't made a public statement regarding this matter and there is no official word if Montague has been fired yet.
Montague's position is important, as it is a position that has access and control over employees' personal information. His employment and history with Sebelius should be throughly reviewed by the media.
If anyone has any tips on this matter, send them our way.
Surprisingly, Sebelius hasn't made a public statement regarding this matter and there is no official word if Montague has been fired yet.
Montague's position is important, as it is a position that has access and control over employees' personal information. His employment and history with Sebelius should be throughly reviewed by the media.
If anyone has any tips on this matter, send them our way.
Are you sure it was not a "prostitution" ring? Maybe it was really just a Democrat fundraiser?
Check out my blog for the very best that true conservatism has to offer. Neo-conservatism and the era of Big Bush Govt has failed us. Mods and Conservs can find common ground in federalism.
Check out my links to great U-tube presentations on the man that can save us from eight more years of Clinton. More of the same will not work any better for us than it is for Larry Crane.
Reply to this
Is this guy an appointed or a civil service employee? Does anyone know if Sibelius would even recognize him if he got on an elevator with her?
What does ConcernedKansas think should happen to David Vitter, who admitted he had been seeing prostitutes?
Reply to this
Er, my mistake! I meant Larry Craig.
Reply to this
Answered my own question, apparently. Montague was a HRD at Juvenile Justice during the Graves administration. Apparently at some point he got a lateral transfer.
http://www.cjonline.com/PalmPilot/stories/072302/com_conference.html
Reply to this
Assuming that the arrest was hetero in nature (a big assumption these days), it appears that the man might have been doing nothing more than practicing what he preached: "To properly deal with juveniles, Montague said, specific problems should be addressed. If a city has high numbers of teen pregnancy and low instances of teen theft, for example, the pregnancy issue should get higher priority."
Reply to this
Isn't it shrewd how the democrat spinmeister mispelled the Guv's moniker in hopes we would not know it was one of her staff running interference?
Reply to this
Kathleen didn't write "Finlandia?"
Reply to this
Sebelius aide?
My guess is, she's never heard of him, numbnuts.
How does it feel to spend your time biting at the ankles of the popular and successful? Just like high school, eh?
Reply to this
Awesome scoop. I wouldn't have known about that at all if not for this blog!!!
Reply to this
Yes, a Bill Graves appointee surely counts as "Sebelius aide." Facebook and now this? God, you guys are really stretching.
And anyway, I thought the Republican Party was fine with prostitutes? If not, someone had ought to tell David Vitter.
Reply to this
"If anyone has any tips on this matter, send them our way."
Like how to not get caught in a prostitution sting? Feeling a little lonely are we?
Reply to this
Easy, Silly Rabbi.
Run for office and win.
Reply to this
The best part of the story is that a city employee was also arrested. A City tow truck driver, in his tow truck and wearing his City uniform, got nabbed for soliciting!!! Awesome.
Damn!! A man has to do what a man has to do. Come to Topeka and get your freak on!!!
Reply to this
Hey Stay Red, are you sure this story should not be about alleged conservatives who pimp themselves out to gamblers and educrats for filthy lucre?
God save us from our own leaders....how many of them put $$$ over principle?
Reply to this
Career bureaucrat does not equal Sebelius aide.
"Sebelius' HR director for the Department of Commerce" is either the most mis-leading or most ignorant thing I've ever read on this blog. (that's saying alot)
This guy is the Department's HR Director, not Sebelius's. He was hired during the Graves admin.
sheesh.
Reply to this
Wrong...he was an employee under Graves, but not HR Director. He became HR Director under Sebelius. As to whether the Governor would recognize him...of course! He's the brother of Kathy McLaughlin her personal assistant! Additional, I believe their family just had a wedding reception out at Cedar Crest. If you check Shawnee Co. Courthouse records you will find additional information related to an earlier settled lawsuit involving Mr. Montague and the Boy Scouts of America...pretty sad indeed...
Reply to this
I'd left a URL above that indicates that he WAS a HRD under Graves. Of course that info is cleverly buried in the lead of the early 2002 story, to wit:
Juvenile justice conference emphasizes prevention
By Tiffany L. Woods The Capital-Journal
Juvenile justice professionals were encouraged Monday not to consider jail as the solution to juvenile crime.
"We have the ability to incarcerate juveniles," said Jeff Montague, director of human resources for the Kansas Juvenile Justice Authority.
As far as a lawsuit, I assume that the info is innocuous, the "anonymous" posting the info knowing that no one is likely to breathlessly run by the lawsuit to check it out. A "settled" lawsuit is unlikely to say which party, if any gave which party any consideration as most are closed.
I'm hardly surprised that no one answered my Vitter question. He is on the Commerce committee of the U.S. Senate, of course; he's not a functionary in a small state's Dept. of Commerce.
Reply to this
O.K., I'll do more legwork for you...surf over to www.shawneecourt.org Then go to "public access"...then look up case #91CV000022. If you'd like more info related to JM...check with Seaman School District...I believe you'll also find he was a former employee there...
Reply to this
Okay. I went to that case #. It was for a 1993 child support order for a Marilyn Downs regarding a child in foster care. What has that to do with "JM?"
Reply to this
Dear "Anonymous" AKA "Fearless Fosdick." I looked up the civil case by last name and found that a case filed against numerous defendants incuding the Boy Scouts, the Church of the Brethren, Jeff Montague and others dragged on for over two and a half years with scores of motions and was dismissed with prejudice against the three plaintiffs.
So, this post by "Anonymous" was "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." Is anyone surprised?
Anyone for tort reform?
Reply to this
Well, I looked but I don't understand legalgobbledygook. What was he supposed to have done??? neglect a boy scout??? Wow. I saw a but-load of parents doing that today at the mall. And yes, he was a teacher at Seaman. Students loved him. He's an awesome guy. Funny, talented. Stupid thing to do.
Reply to this
Sorry, wasn't finished. So why is the fact that he has "control over personal employee information" important in this? You think he cries out social security numbers or years of service during orgasm????
Sex between legal aged adults should be left to the consenting parties and cops need to stay out of it. If I have a product that has value, why is it that can I trade it for dinner and a movie or a ring and 2.3 kids but not $50 cash? It's mine, I own it. It's not going to get used up. It's the ultimate renewable resource. Get the cops out of the bushes and into the business of fighting real crime. Stop ruining peoples lives over this kind of thing.
Reply to this
Totally agree, we should ignore all laws and just enforce the ones YOU like...yeah...let's ignore sodomy, late term abortions, etc....
Reply to this
Sure. Who might ignore this one?
Count Two: Waging Aggressive War, or "Crimes Against Peace" This evidence was defined in the indictment as "the planning, preparation, initiation, and waging of wars of aggression, which were also wars in violation of international treaties, agreements, and assurances."
(From the indictments in the Nuremberg trials.)
Reply to this
"(W)e read of promises by our administration that once we control Iraqi oil, it will be available for allies like France and Russia, who have been reluctant to join our efforts.
What a difference from the days when a declaration of war was clean and precise and accomplished by a responsible Congress and an informed people!
A great irony of all this is that the United Nations Charter doesn’t permit declaring war, especially against a nation that has been in a state of peace for 12 years. The UN can only declare peace. Remember, it wasn’t a war in Korea; it was only a police action to bring about peace. But at least in Korea and Vietnam there was fighting going on, so it was a bit easier to stretch the language than it is today regarding Iraq. Since Iraq doesn’t even have an Air Force or a Navy, is incapable of waging a war, and remains defenseless against the overwhelming powers of the United States and the British, it’s difficult to claim that we’re going into Iraq to restore peace.
History will eventually show that if we launch this attack the real victims will be the innocent Iraqi civilians who despise Saddam Hussein and are terrified of the coming bombs that will destroy their cities.
The greatest beneficiaries of the attack may well be Osama bin Ladin and the al Qaeda. Some in the media have already suggested that the al Qaeda may be encouraging the whole event. Unintended consequences will occur – what will come from this attack is still entirely unknown.
It’s a well-known fact that the al Qaeda are not allies of Saddam Hussein and despise the secularization and partial westernization of Iraqi culture. They would welcome the chaos that’s about to come. This will give them a chance to influence post-Saddam Hussein Iraq. The attack, many believe, will confirm to the Arab world that indeed the Christian West has once again attacked the Muslim East, providing radical fundamentalists a tremendous boost for recruitment.
An up or down vote on declaring war against Iraq would not pass the Congress, and the President has no intention of asking for it. This is unfortunate, because if the process were carried out in a constitutional fashion, the American people and the U.S. Congress would vote "No" on assuming responsibility for this war.
Rep. Ron Paul: October 3, 2002!
Reply to this
The voice of a statesman and not a politician.
The only way to beat the Dems in 2008 is to run an anti-war candidate. Conservatives used to be anti-war, but something bad happened on the way to Rove's perpetual power equation. We confused bravado with true nationalism. God help us. We need a doctor.
Go to my blog and read the posts at Ron Paul Rocks to see what a great cure this statesman offers us. Republican repentance. Conservative consciousness. Common sense in a constitutional framework.
May God help us recognize the cure for our ailment!
Reply to this
Well, that would be great! I totally agree, the world would defiantly be a better place if everyone did what I said. I tell my family that all the time!!!
But where does abortion fit it this conversation? If you think about it, sodomy is a great deterent to abortion isn't it?
Look, I know we need laws but it's gotten a little crazy, don't you think? How many violent crimes were committed while our boys (and girls) in blue were prancing around town trying to entrap some poor schleps into a little roll in the hay. Please.
Reply to this
And why don't you have a name "anonymous"? Lack of imagination, laziness or plain old cowardice?
Reply to this
Because I work for the Kansas Dept. of Commerce under Mr. Montague, and I fear retribution....
Reply to this
You could, of course, make up a unique name so that you could be distinguished from all the other "Anonymouses" (Anonymice?) who post to this site.
Let me suggest a couple:
"Disgruntled"
"Going Postal"
No, those wouldn't work. Montague would probably know instantly who you were.
Reply to this
"Totally agree, we should ignore all laws and just enforce the ones YOU like...yeah...let's ignore sodomy, late term abortions, etc...."
Ummmm... those things are legal, sport. Sorry to tell ya.
Reply to this
phwoxnql http://umctkqlm.com vthnkmpj khvbczqd
Reply to this
[URL=http://dpjryspb.com]ybnceepm[/URL] mpbivzhg http://txlwwnvl.com sqeppswu gnpkytqk ocwreclh">http://zvoollwv.com">ocwreclh
Reply to this
rbohjqav">http://czqeckxb.com">rbohjqav [URL=http://lrbldlmi.com]rhurighe[/URL] nnzyumhq http://lkrdtrxb.com yvokixlf nimupgsk
Reply to this
asentrhj">http://cccsrqyl.com">asentrhj ngbhpaps http://vxsuicph.com conhhdiv qqkacsxp [URL=http://dfomujml.com]hrofnlqr[/URL]
Reply to this
mjqhsxyg http://achioetv.com dsueazjq axwegdoc ggsnzswb">http://bhlkowsw.com">ggsnzswb [URL=http://xpauyvhn.com]nkppieid[/URL]
Reply to this
rsvrbost http://badrnlmq.com gzkjpsnu obsujhde
Reply to this